Supercool. I'll gladly upgrade from 4 to 5 no matter if it's free or not. Why people always want things for free? It's very obvious a lot of headache went into this....
44 Replies
38,914 Views
petrossa
0
Posts
0
Replies
318
Reputation
The only issue i have it doesn't paint the forward/backward buttons, for the rest i have no issues. Not enough reason not to skin it.
101 Replies
182,081 Views
What's wrong with ILook by Adni? (the extra button on the border is not part of the skin, that's from displayfusion)
43 Replies
23,869 Views
Whilst what you say is absolutely true i have 2 issues which prevent me from running it insted of the taskbar. First the size, it takes too much space. Second i am a obsessive compulsive window closer. It's rare i have more windows open then i really actively use. I guess my generation who survived windows 3.0 is so used to the OS BSOD'ing with more then 2 windows active one just doesn't dare opening more. [e digicons]:zoomba:[/e] So there's no real advantage.</
24 Replies
53,279 Views
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="69" id="2929961"]Quoting petrossa, reply 66Evolution is often mistaken for change. Evolution is the refining of existing parts. No and yes. 'Refining' is change. Not all evolution is structural or chemical. Evolution can be emotional and societal... Macro, not micro, and cumulative.[/quote] Compare it to a computer. Because although cliche that's what the brain is. You have hardware and software. The locked down
75 Replies
143,806 Views
Or, if we ar egoing to wax metaphysical anyway: To my mind one views things backwards. Anthropocentric. We exist, therefore everything around must exist for us. The (in)famous Goldilocks Zone for example. Objectively such a zone doesn’t exist. It is to us because we are there. Other lifeforms most likely exist in other configurations and are out there looking for their ‘Goldilocks Zones’ and skipping ours because it’s not like theirs. Thin
75 Replies
143,806 Views
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="65" id="2929809"]I won't lose hope... after all, if we were hardwired and not capable of change, evolution (which can't be thwarted) would not hold true. What was, is and ever shall be - stands in opposition to what we observe in nature (past and present) and against what we observe in the structure of the brain itself as we learn. [/quote] Evolution is often mistaken for change. Evolution is the refining of existing pa
75 Replies
143,806 Views
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="63" id="2929800"]Quoting WebGizmos, reply 56As great as this may all sound I could never back anything like this until we start treating people more humanely. People should come first before anything...do that and you might gain more backers. Indeed. It'd be the right way to prep ourselves for meeting 'others', too. Sometimes I wonder if the interstellar distances were planned to be what they are to allow us, and anyone else, to de
75 Replies
143,806 Views
Or, just a thought, stop boinking like rabbits and do a bit of proper demographic planning. Who knows, we'll be still around by the time we come even close to true spacetravel. The current timeline is for that isn't very hopeful, despite all the hype. At the very best we could send out a seedship and hope for the best. SciFi is way ahead of reality, which is that given the distances involved the whole idea becomes a pipedream. Colonizing m
75 Replies
143,806 Views
With all due respect and then what? Procreate to procreate...... wow what future.
75 Replies
143,806 Views
[quote who="StevenAus" reply="44" id="2929251"]The universe may well have existed forever, and there is some evidence to suggest that the Big Bang wasn't the first of its kind (background radiation and all that). Since time (just what *is* it?) has not yet been defined particularly well, and even though the idea that the universe (or versions of it) may have existed forever may be hard to comprehend, it is not necessarily impossible. Best regards, Steven.[/quote]</p
75 Replies
143,806 Views
In the long run whether homo sapiens colonizes the entire universe is totally irrelevant. The universe itself will cease to be, so why bother? But even when you think there is any point, who cares if ET exists or not. If they do and we swarm out we're bound to encounter them. If not, well ... then not. The money wasted on SETI would be better spent on more productive ventures.
75 Replies
143,806 Views
Or works like an alcohol lock on a car. Win 8 looks at you goes eeeeeek and shuts down.
42 Replies
84,951 Views
Reply to
"Fences" Chosen By Lifehacker in Top Ten MicroApps for Windows
in WinCustomize News
WinCustomize Forums
WinCustomize Forums
i have Fences Pro, and did all the uninstalling/rebooting/installing. Added to that between time i changed computers. So this current one is totally sparkling new with a freshly installed version of Windows7 x64 with SP1. Since it happens on both computers, it worked before SP1 and doesn't with SP1 there's something awry. Contacting Stardock isn't that useful, since as nobody else seems to complain it's not rampant yet.
8 Replies
4,900 Views
Reply to
"Fences" Chosen By Lifehacker in Top Ten MicroApps for Windows
in WinCustomize News
WinCustomize Forums
WinCustomize Forums
i've uninstalled fences because it frequently reboots disfunctional. Fences interface works, but the icons are stuck. Annoying. It didn't do that till W7 SP1 so i guess it's ms's doing.
8 Replies
4,900 Views
This version reintroduces font issues in certain skins. ILook by Adni18 for example, if you select the XP style it works fine, if you select the Win 7 style the font in standard explorer windows becomes faint and discolored. win7 x64
1 Replies
3,609 Views
win7 x64 multimonitor setting. When selecting Left/Rightside of monitor and adding/removing monitors it can happen Tiles latches on to the left/rightside of the first/second/third..... monitor resulting that Tiles is in the center of the desktop neither at the right of the one nor left of the other. If Tiles is in autohide mode there's no way that it unhides Second, even in Tiny setting it takes a lot of real estate. A scaling slider would be nice instead of a preset.<
103 Replies
45,617 Views
Very simple: (in the background, screwed to the wall) <div style="display: none; position: fixed; max-height: 35px; width: 450px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 2px; border-left-width: 2px; border-top-left-radius: 0px; border-top-right-radius: 0px; border-bottom-right-radius: 0px; border-bottom-left-radius: 5px; background-color: #ffffff; o
10 Replies
23,320 Views
they download it for free.
9 Replies
6,424 Views
No darken i have not enabled, only dimming unfocused. I have check beta on in Impulse, always running latest version. And there was no application stopping responding just an application taking a huge load (imageprocessing) I was just surfing a bit whilst the imageprocessing was going on, when suddenly my focused window started swapping focus with a (till then) minimized window. They animated, as in they dimmed, the other to the front and vice versa. Tried to open taskmanager,
9 Replies
6,424 Views
Had this happen a few times now: Under heavy, lasting, CPU load (were it hovers around 60%+) open windows start to loop through their states. One by one they go back and dim, come to front, take focus and lose it before you can do something. Everything becomes unresponsive but background processes continue normally. The only way out is hard reset. Win7 x64
9 Replies
6,424 Views
There some dreams with sound. waterfalls and such. I personally switch the sound of, because you can't listen to the radio or music if it is overlaid with rushing water On a multimonitor system it's very cool. If you're busy it is good to calm the mind to just look at the animation for a while, with some appropriate music. Now i have a coral aquarium with Satie's gymnopedia's. Very soothing.
65 Replies
129,568 Views
[quote who="Gaspershooters" reply="38" id="2871540"]Quoting Neil Banfield, reply 26Have you ever actually tried WindowFX 4? I would be curious to know what you feel is hogging resources in it. Sorry to hurt your feeling as program developer. The main issue is, the latter one (productiveness) got more important than former (hogging/prettiness). [/quote] Sorry to hurt your feelings as incompetent to judge but you really don't know what you are talking about.
65 Replies
129,568 Views
Yeah me too [e digicons]:\[/e] My process viewer tells it uses Winfx432 4k memory, 6 threads, 0% CPU and winfx64 uses 5k, 6 threads and 0% CPU. Wow what a hog (if you have 1980's 640k IBM that is) Obviously a troll. Don't feed the troll
65 Replies
129,568 Views
If you aren't selling as much of them it can only be poor marketing since they both are excellent applications. Winfx4 is absolutely a top notch addition. The reason why MS didn't put it in is i guess lack of business interest. It's a pure homecomputer use application. And homecomputer owners are cheapskates, you'd be surprised how many cracked versions of your stuff float around. [e digicons]>:([/e]
65 Replies
129,568 Views