One thing that one should bare in mind is the fact that "sin is sin." There is no such thing as a little sin or a great sin. I'm sorry, but I can not accept that stealing one of someone's French fries while he's not looking is of the same gravity as murdering him while he's not looking.
So why is the Old Testament still part of the Bible if it's all been superseded and invalidated by the New? When you get the second edition of a book, the errors in the first edition are gone.
Would it be all right if lesbian sisters or gay brothers married then? They can't get each other pregnant. Sounds okay to me!
If not for God and what the Bible teaches, where did you come from? Who/what created/made you? How did you get here? Approximately nine months before my birth, my parents had sexual intercourse, at which time the genetic material from one of my father's sperm merged with that from one of my mother's egg
Liberals, as taught by the NEA, do not believe that Americans have a Creator. They teach our children that they came from monkeys. Most children, taught by liberal teachers, can not read – so they do not know that were is such a thing that spelled their unalienable rights given by a Cre
VS.
You're still an idiot.
Spelling, along with penmanship and sentence structure have fallen on the sword of technology. Comma after "structure."
Masturbation (A) is performed by an overwhelmingly huge majority of the human race, (B) relieves sexual tension without risk of pregnancy or disease, (C) is nowhere explicitly forbidden by the Bible, and (D) hurts absolutely no one. It should be encouraged.
The opinion or will of the majority is irrelevant if an action is unconstitutional, unless the majority can arrange to amend the Constitution. I have no problem with three people getting married. Go for it. An ape can not consent to a marriage; any number of adults can.
"Marriage" is taken because you said so? Sorry, it doesn't work that way. "Marriage" will mean whatever most people use it to mean, and the dictionaries and legislatures will have to follow suit. Should there ever come a time when speakers of English use "marriage" to refer to any two-person union, hetero or homo, then that is what marriage will be. Anyway, I think a better indicator of the increasing non-sanctity of marriage is the
I love you.
QED = quod erat demostrandum
Yikes! Sorry for spamming the board with blanks!
One could argue, and not unreasonably, that it is unconstitutional to forbid it, in which case it is not up to gays to do anything. And we don't live in a democracy.
1) Does it matter to you that some of your friends are not religious Not at all. (I'm not.) 2) After you have known someone for a while, do you care about his/her appearance? Not particularly, no. Unless I'm still trying to sleep with them. 3) Are you inclined to strike a relationship with someone who usually agrees with your politics? Yes. 4) Name the person you would want as President in 2005. Bill Clinton
Ousting the incumbent is a pretty big change...
BigDreamer: "You" is you. Dan: I never understood the point of the Homecoming Court at all. You don't have to tell teenagers whom to drool over. I'm with Poet; I thought it was just to have a boy and a girl, not to have an arranged marriage.
You're an idiot.
Seeing it from the other guy's point of view is seldom the strong point of those who would beat you into heterosexuality with the family Bible. Logic and reason do not apply.
JoeUser Forums