A Visitor From The Past by Thelen Paulk

This is Important.

Something from the "Why is it bad that the Fed is closing down illegal filesharing sites???" thread got to me, and it made me think about something. A poem I read a long time ago by a person named Thelen Paulk. To Americans, this poem should have a very deep meaning. First off, here's what got to me from the other thread.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quoting lifekatana, reply 104



Quoting Drzues,
reply 101
Because we broke our backs earning those rights and privileges. There's nothing wrong with people immigrating as long as it is done legally and at there own cost. Earn your way like everybody else not with your hands out and your palms up.


 

No you didn't, you just got born in a rich country. If you think that little office work you do is back breaking you're a moron.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Read this poem and think about the meaning behind it.

A Visitor From The Past: by Thelen Paulk

I had a dream the other night, I didn't understand.
A figure walking through the mist, with flintlock in his hand.
His clothes were torn and dirty, as he stood there by my bed.
He took off his three-cornered hat, and speaking low, he said:

"We fought a revolution, to secure our liberty.
We wrote the Constitution, as a shield from tyranny.
For future generations, this legacy we gave.
In this, the land of the free and home of the brave.

"The freedom we secured for you, we hoped you'd always keep.
But tyrants labored endlessly while your parents were asleep.
Your freedom gone, your courage lost, you're no more than a slave.
In this, the land of the free and home of the brave.

"You buy permits to travel, and permits to own a gun, permits to
start a business, or to build a place for one.
On land that you believe you own, you pay a yearly rent.
Although you have no voice in choosing, how the money's spent.

"Your children must attend a school that doesn't educate.
Your Christian values can't be taught, according to the state.
You read about the current news, in a regulated press.
You pay a tax you do not owe, to please the I.R.S.

"Your money is no longer made of Silver or of Gold.
You trade your wealth for paper, so your life can be controlled.
You pay for crimes that make our Nation, turn from God in shame.
You've taken Satan's number, as you've traded in your name.

"You've given government control, to those who do you harm,
so they can padlock churches, and steal the family farm, and
keep our country deep in debt, put men of God in jail, and harass
your fellow countrymen, while corrupted courts prevail.

"Your public servants don't uphold the solemn oath they've sworn.
Your daughters visit Doctors, so their children won't be born.
Your leaders ship artillery and guns to foreign shores,
And send your sons to slaughter, fighting other people's wars.

"Can you regain the freedom for which we fought and died?
Or don't you have the courage, or the faith to stand with pride?
Are there no more values for which you'll fight to save?
Or do you wish your children, live in fear and be a slave?

"Sons of the Republic, arise and take a stand!
Defend the Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land!
Preserve our Great Republic, and each GOD-Given Right!
And pray to GOD, to keep the torch of Freedom burning bright!"

As I awoke he vanished, in the mist from whence he came.
His words were true, we are not Free, we have ourselves to blame.
For even now as tyrants trample each GOD-Given Right,
We only watch and tremble, too afraid to stand and fight.

If he stood by your bedside, in a dream, while you're asleep,
and wonders what remains of our Rights he fought to keep,
what would be your answer, if he called out from the grave:

"IS THIS STILL THE LAND OF THE FREE
AND HOME OF THE BRAVE?"

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It's true. None of us broke our backs to get the *Rights* we have today. Instead of us breaking our backs, our Ancestors DIED by the Hundreds of Thousands to SECURE OUR RIGHTS!!!! Let us Not Forget where it is a lot of us are. In the Good Ol U.S.A.!!! Land of the FREE and Home of the Brave!!! Revolutionary Soldiers DIED because they thought they were being treated UNFAIRLY by the British Government. My question is, what would happen if a group tried to start a Second American Revolution? Would it be Constitutional for them to do so? Would the government quickly put them down and execute them all? What would it take to get people to really fight the government here in the US today? Is it even possible? Why do you think various organizations are trying to pass tougher gun laws and take away our guns? I think it's so we can't fight back when push comes to shove. It doesn't have anything to do with keeping guns off the streets. Guns are going to make their way into the wrong hands. That's a fact. If the government takes away the people's rights to own weapons, the criminals are Still going to find a way to smuggle guns into the country. Any other country on the planet that has strict gun control policies can be used as an example. Some countries outlaw the common people from even owning guns at all, yet those countries still have violent crimes and crimes that involve guns. No system of disarming the population is truly fool-proof. Not one. That's a fact too. The more important question to be asking is "Why would our government want to take away guns from Law Abiding Citizens? ". Things are slowly but surely headed in that direction. Once All the people are disarmed then no-one but "Law Enforcement" would have any serious fire-power. At that point the government could do what-ever they wanted and No-One would be able to stand up to them, even if they wanted to. The United States was FOUNDED on the IDEA that the government should Serve The People and if The People were unhappy with the government The People could vote those in power Out Of Power and change the government as they saw fit. Can we really do that in todays society and political climate? Hell No!!! The very second some-one even tried to organize a serious resistance against the government they'd be arrested or even worse just flat out killed and accused of "Terrorism". Have the very ideas that this country was founded on been forgotten?

 

85,437 views 18 replies
Reply #1 Top

Note: I could take or leave all the "Religious" mumbo jumbo and "Christian Values" it talks about. I'm not that religious. Still, when it comes to our constitutional rights and what's become of our so called Government, I think this poem has a lot of meaning.

Reply #2 Top

Any other country on the planet that has strict gun control policies can be used as an example. Some countries outlaw the common people from even owning guns at all, yet those countries still have violent crimes and crimes that involve guns.

It's all about 'numbers'.

Simple fact...no guns...no shootings.

Few guns....few shootings...

Lots of guns....America.

The US has the second highest gun ownership on the planet.

Probably more people [US] die at home from shootings than do US soldiers in Iraq.

Safer to enlist?...or patently absurd?

The REALLY stupid/scary bit is the sort of guns people can have.

Who the hell needs a 50 cal machine gun?  [other than some third world coup leader].

"Honey...just gonna go bag me some rabbits fer stew...."  "Gonna take the 50?"  "Nah...got me a M61 off the old rusty bird out back....them 20mm shells will fillet them varmits at 6000 rounds per minute......sounds like a fart, tho...it shoots so durn quick".

Reply #3 Top

Quoting Jafo, reply 2

Probably more people [US] die at home from shootings than do US soldiers in Iraq.

That's the only part of your reply I don't agree with. We've had WAY more fatalities from war since we got involved in the middle east during Desert Storm and up to now than we've had in the last 10 years from "Accidental Shootings". Note that I say ACCIDENTAL Shootings. I think in this argument "Gun Crime" shouldn't be considered as we're talking about people who Legally Own Guns and not criminals with illegal guns.

The only people I feel sorry for are the people who loose a child because they were too stupid to keep their gun put up correctly. If you follow some common safety tips when owning a gun there's really No Excuse in my eyes for a "Accidental Shooting" to take place. You keep the gun locked in a Gun Cabinet and you keep the ammo locked in a container in the garage. Then you don't tell the kids where the keys are or you only have 1 key and you keep it in your wallet at all times. Problem solved, and little Timmy doesn't accidentally blow his little sister's brains all over the wall.

When it comes to Illegal Gun Crime, that's going to happen anywhere in the world you go. Let's take China for instance. There are more people in China than in the United States. Simply on a percentage base that means China has more criminals than the US does. China also has a "Mafia" style crime syndicate all it's own. Almost all of them own a gun or have access to one through black market connections. I'd guess they have just as much if not more gun crime in China than we do here in the US. The only difference is the US puts it's statistics out there for the whole world to see and compare too, China doesn't, or at least if they do they damn sure aren't being truthful about the numbers.

Then again China also has a totally different value on Human Life than America does. In China if the government wants to build a dam that will flood the area where half a million people have their homes, they MAKE those people move whether they can afford too or not. Actually China is doing that Exact Thing right now. China is in the middle of building the Largest Dam in the World and in the process they've had to relocate millions of peasants. While China does have large and modern cities it also still has small villages with no electricity and no indoor plumbing, though those places are rare they Do still exist in China. Some people have chosen to live the way their ancestors did and they have very little contact with modern technology unless someone brings the technology to them.

Reply #4 Top

Quoting Jafo, reply 2

The US has the second highest gun ownership on the planet.

Probably more people [US] die at home from shootings than do US soldiers in Iraq.

Safer to enlist?...or patently absurd?

The REALLY stupid/scary bit is the sort of guns people can have.

Who the hell needs a 50 cal machine gun?  [other than some third world coup leader].

"Honey...just gonna go bag me some rabbits fer stew...."  "Gonna take the 50?"  "Nah...got me a M61 off the old rusty bird out back....them 20mm shells will fillet them varmits at 6000 rounds per minute......sounds like a fart, tho...it shoots so durn quick".

It's part of the US Constitution that we the people have the right to bare arms, and by "bare arms" I mean own guns, not walk around with our shirts off. This is one of the ideas our country was founded on. This was decided upon because back in those days everyone Needed a gun, if not for hunting food then for self protection and the protection of your family. We didn't have "Police" back in the 1700's.

It was also decided to be necessary to keep the government in check. If everyone in the country has a gun then the government can't have Absolute power because if they get out of line the people can stand up and Fight Back if need be. Jafo, you're in Australia right? What would you do if some kind of messed up shit went down and your government suddenly started treating you all like slaves and the Australian people were forced to the point of having to overthrow the government? How would you even attempt to overthrow a modern military power without weapons? This, in theory, and because we're *free* is why Americans are allowed to buy whatever kinds of guns they want if they can get the right permits. Some more dangerous guns ARE being outlawed though, and for good reason.

Do I think every American should have the right to own a gun? Yes.

Do I think every American should be walking around with Fully Automatic Weapons? No.

Common sense is used for the most part, but the argument all comes down to whether or not we're really free. In a free society anyone should be able to buy whatever they want if they can afford to. Of course some things need to be controlled. Look at Jet-Packs. What would ANY COUNTRY be like if EVERYONE owned a Jet-Pack? It would be Mass Chaos!!! So, some common sense and form of moderate control is needed. The same thing applies with fire-arms.

 

Reply #5 Top

Legally, we can't own fully automatic weapons, not to mention 50Cal. rounds are about $12 dollars a piece if you can find them. The general believe at the time of the addition of the 2nd amendment was that government should fear the people, not the other way around. Much has changed since then in the distance and power of weapons, thus the debate we see every election cycle. I don't have a carry permit, or own a handgun, but kick in my door unannounced and you better be quick! Law Enforcement Officers even have the since to knock and announce themselves before coming in. Criminal home invaders don't, and generally wait till you are not home at least where I live. And to reiterate a point if I depend on the police when the shit hits the fan would mean you would be reading about me in the Obits. the next morning

Reply #6 Top

Who the hell needs a 50 cal machine gun? [other than some third world coup leader].

But that's what ya need when huntin politician varmints! :grin:   And that's small consider what we're up against should a full fledged revolt break out! *_*

Reply #7 Top

It's part of the US Constitution that we the people have the right to bare arms, and by "bare arms"

I hope the wording is 'bear arms' ......;p

Not gonna bother with this debate...it's been done to death....more deaths than the US sees by them.

But....qualifying my statement by only considering ACCIDENTAL shootings is...."Lies, damn lies and statistics".

You can 'spin' anything to make it look good.

Simple maths...

US population / deaths by shooting = x

AUS population / deaths by shooting = y  [AUS as example only]

x > y

END of argument.

 

Reply #8 Top

Quoting Jafo, reply 7

I hope the wording is 'bear arms' ......

Not gonna bother with this debate...it's been done to death....more deaths than the US sees by them.

But....qualifying my statement by only considering ACCIDENTAL shootings is...."Lies, damn lies and statistics".

You can 'spin' anything to make it look good.

Simple maths...

US population / deaths by shooting = x

AUS population / deaths by shooting = y  [AUS as example only]

x > y

END of argument.

Ahh but see, now you're simplifying the argument way too much. There is a difference between violent gun crime and otherwise somehow fatal shootings. Every country on Earth has violent gun crimes, even the countries that don't let their people legally own guns.

It was "bear arms" btw. That's what happens when I've been awake all night and all day. Whole word typos incoming!!! LoL

Reply #9 Top

There is a difference between violent gun crime and otherwise somehow fatal shootings. Every country on Earth has violent gun crimes, even the countries that don't let their people legally own guns.

Death by gun.

Use that as the ONLY LEGITIMATE criterium for comparison.

I am not the one qualifying motives/mitigations/excuses for how or why someone is shot.

The dead don't care why.

It is still a reality that no matter how you want to dismiss some deaths as 'oops...sorry' the % of people in the US who die by gun is higher than elsewhere....[except, I think...Denmark who coincidentally [not] has the highest gun ownership].

You can't use it if you haven't got it.

Reply #10 Top

Well, the problem is Raven X that even though the constitution gives us the right to bear arms, the average person bearing those arms in this country is an idiot or a crazed lunatic.  People should only own guns if the need them for their job, or to hunt to feed their family.  There are no other valid reasons to own a gun IMO, personal protection included.  Sure would cut down on all these accidental shootings and such!

Reply #11 Top

"The right of the people to bear arms shall not be abridged." There are some who'd say Cheney and people are two different things, though I'm not sure that hunting with Cheney would be any more dangerous than going for a drive with Teddy (while he was alive).

 

 

 

Reply #12 Top

Quoting LightStar, reply 10
There are no other valid reasons to own a gun IMO, personal protection included.


Oh wouldn't I just love to turn you into a petite 5', 102-lb woman working the night shift in the inner city, with a statement like that.

You're not an easy target, Tom, so you wouldn't know what it's like to be vulnerable and NEED personal protection.  For those that DO need personal protection, just knowing it's there if they need it, gives them enough confidence to walk down the street not looking like a lame duck.

I'm by no means a gun enthusiast, don't own them myself, don't see the need, since when I DO walk down the street, I have my 80-lb pitbull with me, so I don't look like an easy mark, but I have a handful of friends, one man included, who wouldn't be alive today if they hadn't been armed and had their concealed carry permits.

Aside from personal protection, guns are also good assets to invest your money in; they're more liquid than fine art, so if the economy every totally tanked, they can be liquidated to pay for necessities; they don't usually lose their value.

Why don't we quit pussyfooting around and just make an intelligence test before a person can procreate -- the problem isn't guns...the problem is too many stupid people breeding.

Reply #13 Top

Why don't we quit pussyfooting around and just make an intelligence test before a person can procreate -- the problem isn't guns...the problem is too many stupid people breeding.

 

In the long run Karen, I totally agree with you on that one.  :)

Reply #14 Top

we aussies ended up banning guns because of some pyscho who went on a shooting rampage in tasmania, killing way too many innocent people for nothing......i really hate guns, i wont even touch one.

Im glad we banned them.....im sorry, but that is just how I feel.

Reply #15 Top

the problem isn't guns...the problem is too many stupid people breeding.

......and guns are the cure.

With luck the idiots will do their own cull....;)

Reply #16 Top

Quoting Vampothika, reply 14

Im glad we banned them.....im sorry, but that is just how I feel.

Yeah, Kitty, we'll see how you feel when Zombie outbreak happens in Oz. :rofl:

No, but seriously, the problem with banning them is that then only the criminals own them -- violent people who don't care about the law will find access to the things they want regardless of whether they're banned.  BECAUSE they're banned (in short supply), there will be a great demand for them, and dealing them illegally will be a very lucrative business, making it an attractive business for the worst sorts of human beings.  In that situation, you have a population of thugs and scumbags who are armed and regular, law-abiding citizens are at their mercy in a dark alley.

Prohibition does NOT work -- it didn't work with alcohol, it doesn't work with drugs, and it's not going to work with guns.  Criminals will always find a way to acquire the things they want; legislating things means control over things.  As long as guns are legislated, they cannot be legally sold to children, there's a way to keep track of who buys them, they're TAXED...it's not a perfect setup, but it really does beat the alternative.  OK, so accidents happen...people are ignorant and don't take the proper precautions, they don't take the time to educate the people in their household about how to show proper respect for these things, and tragedy happens.  But tragedy happens twice as more in the United States through traffic accidents than by gun fatalities (and cardiovascular disease tops both of those, and nobody has regulated hamburgers yet).

Reply #17 Top

Im glad we banned them.....im sorry, but that is just how I feel.

 

Why? So many people seem to get a bang out of them.

 

 

the problem isn't guns...the problem is too many stupid people breeding.


......and guns are the cure.

With luck the idiots will do their own cull....

From your mouth to G-d's ear. Unfortunately they seem to cull kill others too. Unfortunately we can't get them all together in one place and yell, "Fire!" and hope they do.

Reply #18 Top

Why don't we quit pussyfooting around and just make an intelligence test before a person can procreate -- the problem isn't guns...the problem is too many stupid people breeding.

k10w3.. your my hero..