CURSED FORUMS!!! I WILL CRUSH ALL THOSE WHO EAT MY POSTS!!! THIS GREAT HERESY MUST BE CLEANSED FROM THE MORTAL WORLD!!!
/begin really long post, part 1
Which one do you think has the best campaign? DoW, DoW WA, DoW DC or DoW SoulStorm? (Just their campaign part)
In the DoW, DC, and SS (SS=SoulStorm) campaigns, you control 1+ companies of Blood Ravens marines (10 companies/chapter BTW); the armor livery you see in DC is the standard Blood Raven scheme.
DoW1's campaign is very cool, gripping, but totally linear and with semi-repetitive mission objectives; WA's campaign is divided into 2, one for the Order forces (Eldar+IG), and 1 for the Disorder forces (Chaos+Orks); there are 2 endings to each campaign, one for each faction (you switch between factions for Mission #4 and whichever faction completes all objectives in M4 goes to M5-racial).
I only have DoW1+WA, but from hearing the words of others who have played all 4, the Dark Crusade campaign is generally acknowedged as the best; SS's campaign was complete crap in comparison to DC's, and the 1st games' campaigns are fun if you want to know some backstory to DC/SS.
"my beliefs get shafted so that the homos and the Jihadists can freely practice whatever the hell they want." ....huh?
"Quite frankly, the current state of America right now disgusts me;" Yeah, same here.
I am not sure that you understand what the Venus project is about. Have you read it? I guess not....sigh. Ok. Imagine a world with no money, no goverments, no religion institutions, no organizations, no companies, no prisons, no military, none of this. Also, all the earth's resources, and land, declared ALL of the people's heritage, all material things are shared, and people dont "work", but rather spend their time creatively doing things they want, like research, resource management, systems monitoring, etc. The term "ownership" is completely and utterly annihilated, and human beings do not claim ownership in anything. People can travel and see the whole world, living wherever the hell they want, either with other people, or alone. Basically, true freedom and unlimited rights for everyone.
I cant describe everything to you, but if you want specifics on the Venus project, just follow the link I posted, but please, dont jump to conclusions when you havent gotten the time to learn more about the whole concept.
1. I state that thing about homosexuals/Jihadists because every single minority group seems to be allowed to do whatever the hell they want; the only possible exception are those people who could be called "Fundamental Evangelical Christians"; these people are told to shut up otherwise you will offend the homos/whoever else, when those very people are offending me. My rights as an American aren't being respected, why should I respect the rights of those who trample mine? It will all turn into a tyrannical, anti-religion institution that I will then feel the need to cleanse from this mortal world.
2. Even a world without all those things will eventually develop them; what happens when there is a massive crisis and different people come up with multiple, equally valid solutions, but each person believes their solution is the right one? You then get factionalization, and because nobody can decide what to do, people will start making religions on their own, to give themselves hope.
That's probably the biggest thing you miss about religion; for the most part, it gives its practitioners a hope that nothing else can.
Quoting Alpha_003_Snipe,
reply 1394
Unlimited rights... The right to take what you want, to do what you want, and not to be stopped. You need something to enforce rules that stop murder and theft surely? Then you have a symbol of authority, which is either followed or opposed, creating a form of unity, I suppose, but sort of going against the point of the project.
Without a symbol of authority, you have anarchy. If a vote is taken without some kind of police force to enforce the final decision, people who disagree will still do what they want. If I'm missing something, please tell me. I just don't see how humanity and this project are compatible.
"I can be your villain baby. I'll accentuate your pain. I will torture you forever. I'll take your breath away."
Villain
There is no need for any symbol of authority, because people would not have any reason to steal, kill, or harm anyone. There would be no personal gain from this. Why would you kill someone? Why would you steal something that is already yours?
Like I said, the concept of "ownership" would be obsolete. Also, anarchy happens, only when a group of people question the government, or the police, or any kind of authority. These things would not exist, ergo, no anarchy would be possible. As for the vote disagreement, people would not create conflict, because some things they vote for would occur, while others would not. And what do you think these things would be anyway? It would be things like: "Do you want the new train transportation to be a. white b. blue or c. green, things like that. What would there to vote for? The next president? LOL Most things would be just numbers and math anyway, these things cant be questioned. If in a particular place in the world is know for its strong winds, then the wind energy is the most efficient in that area, so that type of energy would be used in that place.
These are examples, but you get the point.
Also, since you and Whiskey insist so much on people's nature and stuff like that, I am going to say once again, that there is NO such thing as "human nature". If you still insist that in that world there would still be conflict, then do you know what the world civility means? If we reach the point where we finally create such a world, then our whole culture will be changed throughout the years, create a new type of culture, changing entirely the way we think, thus forming true civility in every human being.
All these things seem impossible to you, simply because we were never able to achieve them.
Again, since you haven't gotten the time to read or watch a video regarding the Venus project, don't rush to conclusions.
3. "Why would you kill someone" There are people who kill other human beings for no other reason than to kill them. There are others who derive enjoyment from the act of killing.
4. What you are speaking of is known as utopia. Utopia has the great pitfall of stagnation. Stagnation leads to a slow exctinction, where you only realize the truth when it is too late. In such a society as what you describe, what motive for betterment would exist?
5. The civilization you describe is also communist/socialist; to date, no purely communist/socialist state has ever endured.
6. You'd be surprised what human beings can use for an excuse to rebel against, well, anything really. A teenager might rebel against their parents for not letting them wear a certains style of clothing, because the parents consider it to be inappropriate.
7. What would be the measure of morality? More importantly, what is used as the basis to create said measure of morality? You probably won't believe me, but the books of the Bible (especially the Pentateuch/Torah, e.g.- Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy) were used as the basis of laws and of basic moral concepts. Why do you think adultery (someone cheating on their husband/wife) causes such a big scandal?
I actually didn't read anything once the posts started getting over 40 lines long...
Here, I'm fairly sure that you all can appreciate what this video is about.
WARNING! WARNING! WARNING! This Video has been banned and re-made in considerable parts of the Western World for being graphic, and for the risk of epileptic seizures in epileptic individuals.
"This IS Entertainment! Lies ARE Entertainment! You ARE Down on your knees, begging me for MORE!"
Xer0 \^/
That video is simply wierd.
*Sigh*
Must I get involved? I guess so...
first: Play this in the background while reading
The concept of "ownership" is one of the most crucial that we have. If nobody owned anything, nobody would take responsibility or care for any of the "shared" property. Note public areas, such as parks and restrooms, how quickly they decay into filth and disrepair. Then note private property, and how it's almost always crisp and clean, thanks to the pride of the owner(s). People also couldn't live without a leader. Without someone to guide them, most people would lose their way and commit crime, do drugs, among other things, just to find a purpose. Religion; for example. Religion exists for the sole fact that mankind can ask the question, "Why?". And since we cannot answer that question in its entirety, we need to confirm our existence, our perception of reality. So, most people go to religion for this. Similarly, if there is no such thing as "Human Nature" explain why we love, why we hate, why we antagonize and why we have pride. Human Nature is a bizarre and misleading term for what it really is, but IMO Human Nature is just a lazy man's way of explaining why we have emotions and subconscious thought while other organisms, even sentient ones, seem to feel only pain and joy. I'll admit that I have yet to see, hear or know of the Venus Project, but based on what I can gather, it's for creating a utopian society. Well, for starters, in a utopian society, there is NO culture. Why? Because every culture has it's own opinion upon various things, and not everyone will ever agree completely upon anything. Therefore: the only way to achieve the utopia that you seek, the "civility", per-se is to remove from each individual, completely, thier individuality, who they are and why they think they're there.
Xer0 \^/
Some very good points, but ownership is really irrelevant because anyone can say they own anything or everything and it doesn't mean it's true.
/end really long post, part 1
"In the grim darkness of the far future, there is only war..."